- About Us
- Local Savings
- Green Editions
- Legal Notices
- Weekly Ads
State ferry routes sustainable, say two key legislators; funding resources set in transportation budgets
By Scott Panitz – WNPA Olympia News Bureau
The Washington State Legislature will find the money needed to keep all state ferry routes open, declared Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen (D-10th, Camano Island), chairwoman of the Senate Transportation Committee last week.State officials have said, since early January, that up to five current ferry routes could be eliminated if no new revenue source for the ferry system is found.“People get uptight because the governor and the Department of Transportation said if we don’t [find new revenue] then we’re going to cut all these ferry routes,” said Haugen. “We’re not going to cut all these ferry routes.”Haugen and her counterpart in the House Transportation Committee, Rep. Judy Clibborn (D-41st, Mercer Island), are working together on a revenue package that would keep all the ferries running at an acceptable capacity until a larger, more sustainable package can be instituted.One revenue package that is not being counted on, however, is Gov. Chris Gregoire’s oil barrel fee, which she announced during her State of the State address in early January.The governor proposed the $3.7 billion revenue resource package as a way to help solve the state’s massive projected transportation maintenance deficit, which includes a $1.3 billion shortfall for ferry operations over the next 10 years.Clibborn, said that, while the bill — HB 2660 — was passed out of her committee, it did so in a watered down form, and isn’t likely to advance.“Relying on that doesn’t feel like the only thing that we should be doing,” she said. “When you look at the needs of the budget, ferries are a very small piece, but they are critical.”Haugen agreed, indicating that the Senate considers its version, SB 6455, to be a tax that would require a super-majority of 66 percent to pass. She denounced it as “dead.”David Moseley, WSDOT Ferries Division assistant secretary, who called the oil-barrel fee a “solution” to the ferry system’s financial woes back in January, is taking the wait-and-see approach to the new package.“It’s obviously substantially less, and how much of that would be for the ferries division we may not know until the budget is finally dealt with,” he said.Moseley said that the ferry system operating budget for the current biennium is around $475 million with $310 million of that covered through fare-collection and the rest covered by transfers from other transportation accounts. The money available from those accounts is set to drop significantly with the impending expiration of the 2003 Nickel Funding package, combined with a high need for road maintenance.The forms of the packages differ, but they serve to accomplish the same thing: increasing certain licensing fees to raise money for state transportation accounts, including ferry operations and capital.Clibborn’s version is bound up in just one bill, HB 2053, which was passed out of the House at the end of last year’s regular session, but ran out of time in the Senate. It would contain about 14 different fees including drivers’ license fees, dealer fees, and title registration fees.Currently sitting in the House Rules Committee, that iteration of the bill would raise around $55 million this year for the state’s transportation accounts and over twice that for the next two biennia. Clibborn said she plans to bolster that version of the bill and increase the amount of revenue it will provide with some additional fees.Both legislators said that, unless they are amended substantially, the bills in the package should provide enough money to sustain ferry operations until the end of the next biennium in 2015. A second 144-car ferry, which would be partially bonded, according to Haugen, would also be in the works.Building that second ferry within the next biennium, stated Clibborn, would save the state millions of dollars since the infrastructure for the first one remains intact and can be recycled.While Clibborn is optimistic, she is also realistic.“In the end, we have to reconcile the two packages,” said Clibborn. “Say that, as they move along, somebody amends those bills, or somebody amends my bill, and something gets taken out because people don’t like it, then I will have less revenue. I can’t really say exactly where the revenue will be until we get all done with both bills in our place and her (Haugen’s) place and then we sit down.”“We’re not closing any roads in this state,” said Sen. Haugen, who has represented Camino and Whidbey islands in the legislature since 1982. “If we’re going to close down a ferry route, we’re going to close down a state route somewhere on the mainland, because . . . ferries are (part of our highway system).”Clibborn said her proposal should hit the floor around Feb. 16, along with her House Transportation Budget.