Letters to the Editor

Letters from Oct. 24, 2007

County growth: Enact basic regulations

No surprise that the same “No Growth” interests the county has tried to placate in land use regulation remain displeased and resort to court action. The County goes the extra mile to implement highly restrictive interpretations of GMA into local regulation, seldom satisfying the “No Growth” crowd. The cost of the county’s attempts to placate these “No Growthers” and their predictable litigation is borne by taxpayers in increased cost of government and increased housing costs.

The “No Growth” elements work to force more extreme regulation but have no vested interest in the property they attempt to control. They do not own it or pay the taxes on it. They have no right to enter it or use it in any way. They only seek to deny use to the rightful owners.

The county has a simple way out of the problem. Stop trying to placate the “No Growth” crowd. Enact simple, basic regulations in compliance with GMA. Eliminate complex “conditional” regulations that open the door to litigation. In the end, we might find lower litigation costs, lower costs to prepare and maintain regulations, and lower regulatory cost to home and business construction. Sounds like a winner to me.



We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Oct 21
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates